Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+FILE\s+devclass\s+tactics\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [ADSM-L] FILE devclass tactics? (score: 1)
Author: "Allen S. Rout" <asr AT UFL DOT EDU>
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 12:26:45 -0500
Anybody who's using FILE devclasses to accept backups willing to discuss their config, how they got there, and what they like and dislike? I'm working out how to use FILE devclasses effectively, and
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-12/msg00126.html (12,955 bytes)

2. Re: [ADSM-L] FILE devclass tactics? (score: 1)
Author: Matthew Glanville <matthew.glanville AT KODAK DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 14:47:03 -0500
I have the exact same complaints about the 'FILE' devclass... If only they would implement a different concept for it's hi/low/migration settings and migrate things better. I wish it would use a volu
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-12/msg00127.html (14,529 bytes)

3. Re: [ADSM-L] FILE devclass tactics? (score: 1)
Author: "Allen S. Rout" <asr AT UFL DOT EDU>
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 23:29:07 -0500
This is much much harder than you might think. For example, the config I was aiming for would have had three 1.7TB filesystems used for a devclass, volumes shared out from a library manager, volumes
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-12/msg00130.html (11,391 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu