Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+Dedupe\s+Storage\s+Appliances\s+Question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+Dedupe\s+Storage\s+Appliances\s+Question\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [ADSM-L] Dedupe Storage Appliances Question (score: 1): Author: woodbm <tsm-forum AT BACKUPCENTRAL DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 10:00:05 -0500; Hello all, I am sure this topic has been covered, but I am about to issue an RFI and RFP for a new dedupe storage appliance for our TSM environment. I was curious on your opinions on who the leading; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2011-02/msg00205.html (11,595 bytes)
2. Re: [ADSM-L] Dedupe Storage Appliances Question (score: 1): Author: "Huebner,Andy,FORT WORTH,IT" <Andy.Huebner AT ALCONLABS DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 09:30:21 -0600; FalconStor and Quantum were in our list when we evaluated and purchased our system. We bought a DataDomain. Andy Huebner Hello all, I am sure this topic has been covered, but I am about to issue an R; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2011-02/msg00207.html (12,555 bytes)
3. Re: [ADSM-L] Dedupe Storage Appliances Question (score: 1): Author: Richard Rhodes <rrhodes AT FIRSTENERGYCORP DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 11:36:13 -0500; For FalconStor, did you contact them directly or talk to a var? I don't know of any major vendor that handles resells FalconStor anymore, although I read a article that sayd HDS was going to pick the; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2011-02/msg00213.html (14,022 bytes)
4. Re: [ADSM-L] Dedupe Storage Appliances Question (score: 1): Author: "Huebner,Andy,FORT WORTH,IT" <Andy.Huebner AT ALCONLABS DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 10:49:15 -0600; We talked with FalconStor. Andy Huebner For FalconStor, did you contact them directly or talk to a var? I don't know of any major vendor that handles resells FalconStor anymore, although I read a art; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2011-02/msg00215.html (14,915 bytes)
5. Re: [ADSM-L] Dedupe Storage Appliances Question (score: 1): Author: Steven Langdale <steven.langdale AT GMAIL DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 19:58:28 +0000; We use both DataDomain (only file devclass over NFS) and ProtecTier. Both work well we've tended to use the ProtecTier's in our larger environments. Steven; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2011-02/msg00223.html (11,277 bytes)
6. Re: [ADSM-L] Dedupe Storage Appliances Question (score: 1): Author: Johnny Lea <jlea AT UMC DOT EDU>; Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 15:12:32 -0600; I use Datadomain and love it. Johnny Lea Hello all, I am sure this topic has been covered, but I am about to issue an RFI and RFP for a new dedupe storage appliance for our TSM environment. I was cur; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2011-02/msg00239.html (12,320 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]