Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+Database\s+size\,\s+Split\s+to\s+multiple\s+instances\s+or\s+wait\s+for\s+version\s+6\.1\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+Database\s+size\,\s+Split\s+to\s+multiple\s+instances\s+or\s+wait\s+for\s+version\s+6\.1\s*$/: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. [ADSM-L] Database size, Split to multiple instances or wait for version 6.1 (score: 1): Author: "Conradt, Jeremy" <JConradt AT ASHLEYFURNITURE DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 15:24:34 -0600; I have a TSM server currently running version 5.3.5 on Windows 2003 that we plan to upgrade soon. The problem I have is our database has grown to 350 GB. The question I have is will version 6.1 of TS; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2008-12/msg00068.html (12,685 bytes)
2. Re: [ADSM-L] Database size, Split to multiple instances or wait for version 6.1 (score: 1): Author: Paul Zarnowski <psz1 AT CORNELL DOT EDU>; Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 19:54:20 -0500; One thing to consider is that migrating that large of a database to TSM 6.1 (DB2) may take a loong time. We have a large, old, database as well, and I am concerned about the amount of time it will ta; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2008-12/msg00078.html (13,846 bytes)
3. Re: [ADSM-L] Database size, Split to multiple instances or wait for version 6.1 (score: 1): Author: Wanda Prather <wprather AT JASI DOT COM>; Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 20:01:20 -0500; How long does it take you now to do Expiration and DB backup?; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2008-12/msg00079.html (13,497 bytes)
4. Re: [ADSM-L] Database size, Split to multiple instances or wait for version 6.1 (score: 1): Author: "Evans, Bill" <bevans AT FHCRC DOT ORG>; Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 17:17:51 -0800; We exported from a SUN E4800 to an IBM p570, both having 8 LTO3 drives attached, while both were still fully functioning as fileservers and backup servers. We moved around 2TB/24 hours, took several(; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2008-12/msg00080.html (14,168 bytes)
5. Re: [ADSM-L] Database size, Split to multiple instances or wait for version 6.1 (score: 1): Author: "Conradt, Jeremy" <JConradt AT ASHLEYFURNITURE DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 10:18:54 -0600; Expiration takes about 1 hour. DB Backup takes about 1 hour 15 minutes. Thanks, Jeremy --Original Message-- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of Wanda Prath; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2008-12/msg00085.html (14,346 bytes)
6. Re: [ADSM-L] Database size, Split to multiple instances or wait for version 6.1 (score: 1): Author: "Bos, Karel" <Karel.Bos AT ATOSORIGIN DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 17:45:07 +0100; Ok, 350GB tsm db backing up in 1 hour? How did you get it that fast? Regards, Karel --Original Message-- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of Conradt, Jerem; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2008-12/msg00086.html (15,288 bytes)
7. Re: [ADSM-L] Database size, Split to multiple instances or wait for version 6.1 (score: 1): Author: Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU <zforray AT VCU DOT EDU>; Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 11:53:29 -0500; Are you mis-reading/writing that info? 350GB takes 1-hour to expire and about the same to backup?? My 190GB DB used to take 48+ hours to run expire (350M objects) and 2-hours for a full backups! With; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2008-12/msg00088.html (14,685 bytes)
8. Re: [ADSM-L] Database size, Split to multiple instances or wait for version 6.1 (score: 1): Author: Wanda Prather <wprather AT JASI DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 12:02:15 -0500; Well, I'd say that you are doing great right now, if you can do a DB backup of 350 G from a Windows box in an hour and 15 minutes! The biggest problem you are likely to have, as mentioned, is the tim; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2008-12/msg00089.html (15,525 bytes)
9. Re: [ADSM-L] Database size, Split to multiple instances or wait for version 6.1 (score: 1): Author: "Conradt, Jeremy" <JConradt AT ASHLEYFURNITURE DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 11:05:43 -0600; Its actually not 350 GB. The actual used size is: Available Assigned Maximum Maximum Page Total Used Pct Max. Space Capacity Extension Reduction Size Usable Pages Util Pct (MB) (MB) (MB) (MB) (bytes); /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2008-12/msg00092.html (17,345 bytes)
10. Re: [ADSM-L] Database size, Split to multiple instances or wait for version 6.1 (score: 1): Author: Remco Post <r.post AT PLCS DOT NL>; Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 18:08:33 +0100; Ok, 350GB tsm db backing up in 1 hour? How did you get it that fast? lots of very fast disk, very wide striping? And I guess using stk t10kb drives of disk to store the backups, since those are the; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2008-12/msg00093.html (15,640 bytes)
11. Re: [ADSM-L] Database size, Split to multiple instances or wait for version 6.1 (score: 1): Author: Paul Zarnowski <psz1 AT CORNELL DOT EDU>; Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 18:50:23 -0500; Interesting.. we have a database that's about the same size, but it takes us 2 hours and 40 minutes to back it up to LTO3. We also have 15K rpm 36GB drives, in two mirrored RAID5,7 sets (TSM mirrorin; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2008-12/msg00102.html (18,128 bytes)
12. Re: [ADSM-L] Database size, Split to multiple instances or wait for version 6.1 (score: 1): Author: Timothy Hughes <Timothy.Hughes AT OIT.STATE.NJ DOT US>; Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 07:53:53 -0500; SSD? There not up that capacity yet or are they? Ok, 350GB tsm db backing up in 1 hour? How did you get it that fast? lots of very fast disk, very wide striping? And I guess using stk t10kb drives of; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2008-12/msg00110.html (15,816 bytes)
13. Re: [ADSM-L] Database size, Split to multiple instances or wait for version 6.1 (score: 1): Author: Henrik Ahlgren <pablo AT ELMA DOT NET>; Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 15:52:29 +0200; Are you mis-reading/writing that info? 350GB takes 1-hour to expire and about the same to backup?? My 190GB DB used to take 48+ hours to run expire (350M objects) and 2-hours for a full backups! Wit; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2008-12/msg00115.html (13,705 bytes)
14. Re: [ADSM-L] Database size, Split to multiple instances or wait for version 6.1 (score: 1): Author: "Allen S. Rout" <asr AT UFL DOT EDU>; Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 13:10:43 -0500; Is that SSA? I thought you were still on that. - Allen S. Rout; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2008-12/msg00126.html (13,930 bytes)
15. Re: [ADSM-L] Database size, Split to multiple instances or wait for version 6.1 (score: 1): Author: Timothy Hughes <Timothy.Hughes AT OIT.STATE.NJ DOT US>; Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 13:23:48 -0500; Is this true in regards to TSM V6.1? Also Is it due out in Jan-Feb? The biggest single change will the conversion of the database to DB2, or UDB as it is often called these days. This will be a packa; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2008-12/msg00127.html (16,068 bytes)
16. Re: [ADSM-L] Database size, Split to multiple instances or wait for version 6.1 (score: 1): Author: "Conradt, Jeremy" <JConradt AT ASHLEYFURNITURE DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 12:56:42 -0600; We started using Tivoli in October of 2006 with version 5.3 but I did have to perform a DB Export to repair some issues with it. I can't find exactly when I did it but I think it was in 2007, June ti; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2008-12/msg00129.html (19,818 bytes)
17. Re: [ADSM-L] Database size, Split to multiple instances or wait for version 6.1 (score: 1): Author: Paul Zarnowski <psz1 AT CORNELL DOT EDU>; Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 13:54:28 -0500; No, DS4500. We got off of SSA years ago. The 15K made a huge difference for us. said: Is that SSA? I thought you were still on that. - Allen S. Rout -- Paul Zarnowski Ph: 607-255-4757 Manager, Storag; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2008-12/msg00130.html (14,280 bytes)
18. Re: [ADSM-L] Database size, Split to multiple instances or wait for version 6.1 (score: 1): Author: Richard Rhodes <rrhodes AT FIRSTENERGYCORP DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 15:25:28 -0500; We recently had a meeting with IBM where they told us that v6.1 will be announced at some big IBM conference in March (I think). They told us that being at v5.5 is a requirement for upgrading to v6.1; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2008-12/msg00131.html (17,388 bytes)
19. Re: [ADSM-L] Database size, Split to multiple instances or wait for version 6.1 (score: 1): Author: "Dennis, Melburn (IT Solutions US)" <melburn.dennis AT SIEMENS DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 15:34:35 -0500; I heard December 8th was going to be the GA release of this. --Original Message-- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of Richard Rhodes Sent: Friday, December; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2008-12/msg00132.html (17,688 bytes)
20. Re: [ADSM-L] Database size, Split to multiple instances or wait for version 6.1 (score: 1): Author: "Adrian C. Pardo" <apardo AT QUINTEC.COM DOT AR>; Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 19:11:51 -0200; Pulse 2009 February 8-12 Las Vegas Nevada Big improvements in DB capacity, recovery log, better reporting.. My advice is wait till announcement day, will be a great product Adrian Pardo Buenos Aires-; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2008-12/msg00151.html (17,708 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1]