Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+Collocation\s+by\s+group\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+Collocation\s+by\s+group\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [ADSM-L] Collocation by group (score: 1): Author: Richard Mochnaczewski <Richard.Mochnaczewski AT STANDARDLIFE DOT CA>; Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 11:16:43 -0400; Hi *, I am trying to setup collocation by group ( running TSM 5.3.3.0 on AIX 5.2 ML9 ). I created the collocation group and added a new node to to it which has been backed up in TSM before but not us; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-06/msg00397.html (11,629 bytes)
2. Re: [ADSM-L] Collocation by group (score: 1): Author: Nick Laflamme <nick.laflamme AT NIST DOT GOV>; Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 15:13:12 -0400; I am trying to setup collocation by group ( running TSM 5.3.3.0 on AIX 5.2 ML9 ). I created the collocation group and added a new node to to it which has been backed up in TSM before but not using co; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-06/msg00404.html (12,281 bytes)
3. Re: [ADSM-L] Collocation by group (score: 1): Author: Richard Mochnaczewski <Richard.Mochnaczewski AT STANDARDLIFE DOT CA>; Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 15:32:25 -0400; Actually, on my tape pools I had to enable collocate by group instead of node. I don't see the point in doing a move nodedata. Why would I want to collocate all my data on that node ? If I run a sele; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-06/msg00406.html (13,187 bytes)
4. Re: [ADSM-L] Collocation by group (score: 1): Author: Nick Laflamme <nick.laflamme AT NIST DOT GOV>; Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 15:48:51 -0400; I misread your note, and I apologize. What I wrote made sense if you were asking about a node that was already known to TSM but hadn't been in the collocated pool before you added it to the collocati; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-06/msg00407.html (11,976 bytes)
5. Re: [ADSM-L] Collocation by group (score: 1): Author: Richard Mochnaczewski <Richard.Mochnaczewski AT STANDARDLIFE DOT CA>; Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 15:55:55 -0400; No problem. Everyone has a different take on how things get done. Sometimes. there is no one way to do something in TSM. I misread your note, and I apologize. What I wrote made sense if you were aski; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-06/msg00408.html (12,320 bytes)
6. Re: [ADSM-L] Collocation by group (score: 1): Author: David E Ehresman <deehre01 AT LOUISVILLE DOT EDU>; Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 08:31:04 -0400; I **think** what might be happening if that since the 2nd node was already collocated and has data on tape, the backup stg pool is trying to fill the existing tape with that node's data. David Hi *,; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-06/msg00438.html (12,001 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]