- 1. Dumpcycles vs Runs (score: 1)
- Author: Jason Greenberg <jg AT execulink DOT com>
- Date: 14 Sep 2002 12:57:15 -0400
- You'll have to excuse my newbieness for this one, if you would... If I have a dumpcycle of 7 days, with 7 runs per cylce, I understand that I will have a full backup every 7 days. So, if that's the c
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2002-09/msg00360.html (10,777 bytes)
- 2. Re: Dumpcycles vs Runs (score: 1)
- Author: Jon LaBadie <jon AT jgcomp DOT com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 13:33:28 -0400
- In that case, use a different backup program. Unless you only plan to backup (run amdump) once a week. Then: dumpcycle 1 wk # maybe 0 runspercycle 1 runtapes 1 tapecycle 15 -- Jon H. LaBadie jon AT j
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2002-09/msg00364.html (11,325 bytes)
- 3. Re: Dumpcycles vs Runs (score: 1)
- Author: Niall O Broin <niall AT magicgoeshere DOT com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 18:33:54 +0100
- 7 x runtapes (which is the number of tapes used per run) After every run - amanda is a backup solution for people who are serious about backing up their data, and that means that you don't put a numb
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2002-09/msg00365.html (11,567 bytes)
- 4. Re: Dumpcycles vs Runs (score: 1)
- Author: Gene Heskett <gene_heskett AT iolinc DOT net>
- Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 13:47:53 -0400
- At least one per run, more if you permit, and amanda needs to use. Run, but not until the next dump, or amcheck run which is why you have a cron job in the middle of the day that does this amcheck, a
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2002-09/msg00366.html (13,277 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu