Results 1 to 11 of 11
-
11-28-2012, 02:48 AM #1Newcomer
- Join Date
- Sep 2012
- Posts
- 11
- Thanks
- 0
- Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
File backup full + incremental, how ??
Hello!
Please advice.
I want to backup my files with scheme: first day - full backup, next six days - incremental; then again - full backup, next six days - incremental.
How to achieve this?
Selective as I understand is not a good solution.
I don't know how to get full backup in a middle of series.
Thanks.
-
11-28-2012, 04:32 AM #2
TSM use a progressive backup methodology, TSM also differs from other common storage solutions!
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infoce...cremental.html
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/tividd...L/anraqs15.htmIf Microsoft is the answer, I want my problem back!
-
11-28-2012, 08:02 AM #3
-
11-28-2012, 08:48 AM #4Newcomer
- Join Date
- Sep 2012
- Posts
- 11
- Thanks
- 0
- Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks for response.
I am satisfied with TSM ways and its progressive incremental backup.
Seems you didn't understand my problem exactly, or my description was not quite right.
If file doesn't change for a long time and only one copy is stored on TSM storage,this is not reliably.
I want to exclude such cases and sometimes to take all files, not only changed.
I know only one solution: changing mode(modified&absolute) in copygroup.
Its complicated, I thought there are another ways.
-
11-28-2012, 09:21 AM #5Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- Somewhere in the US
- Posts
- 5,303
- Thanks
- 2
- Thanked 138 Times in 136 Posts
What do mean by "If file doesn't change for a long time and only one copy is stored on TSM storage,this is not reliably."?
This has always been the case and works well. If you are worried that the file remains stagnant on one location for a long time since it has not changed, then you have not desgned the system well. TSM has two copies of the file - online tape pool and offline tape pool (DR tapes). Files are moved when reclamation runs both on the online and offsite tape pools, which generally means that it does not stay on one location for its 'life'.Last edited by moon-buddy; 11-28-2012 at 12:07 PM.
Ed
-
11-28-2012, 11:22 AM #6Newcomer
- Join Date
- Sep 2012
- Posts
- 11
- Thanks
- 0
- Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
'online tape pool and offline tape pool (DR tapes)'
Did you mean primary and copy pool?
-
11-28-2012, 12:03 PM #7
-
11-28-2012, 02:57 PM #8Newcomer
- Join Date
- Sep 2012
- Posts
- 11
- Thanks
- 0
- Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Unfortunately We don't have resources for copy pools, amount of productive data are so huge and always increase. All storage are covered by primary pools.
-
11-28-2012, 04:18 PM #9Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- Somewhere in the US
- Posts
- 5,303
- Thanks
- 2
- Thanked 138 Times in 136 Posts
This is very unfortunate - if your data center burns down, good-bye data. There is no way that you can recover.
Also, if one tape goes bad, guess what problem do you have.
If I were you, I will create the copy pools quickly. And if management does not see this as BIG issue, try washing your hands from any liability. I would quit over this type of issues anytime.Last edited by moon-buddy; 11-28-2012 at 06:06 PM.
Ed
-
11-28-2012, 05:26 PM #10Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Posts
- 69
- Thanks
- 1
- Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
You would use less tapes creating and maintaining copypools than if you try the dated approach of full and incrementals.
How much data is huge? It would help us put it into perspective. Large sites don't normally have issues finding the resources to protect their data.
-
11-29-2012, 07:56 AM #11Newcomer
- Join Date
- Sep 2012
- Posts
- 11
- Thanks
- 0
- Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Main stream in our environment are Oracle DBs(each around of 40 TB). They are backuped everyday on full backup basis. We considered no need in copy pools. It requires too much resources for duplication.
For offsite purpose we make vault backup to special primary pool and ejecting these tapes.
But recently tasks for file backups have appeared.
Why solution with copy pool is confusing me:
Copy pool stores all data from primary stgpool. Hundreds of clients are backuping data to this primary pool.
And only one client requires to duplicate its data. To be more safety. Performing of fulll backup(all data, not changed) once in two weeks will be good possibility in this case.
Or it is ok to create dedicated primary pool for our client and backup it to dedicated copy pool? Not simple from my view.
Similar Threads
-
Command to tell which tape backup is full vs incremental
By lmchugh in forum Backup / Archive DiscussionReplies: 6Last Post: 07-15-2010, 06:32 PM -
Restore Full System from Incremental Backup
By nayeemag in forum Backup / Archive DiscussionReplies: 2Last Post: 01-14-2010, 04:56 PM -
Full/Incremental/Diff Backup Issues
By sam45 in forum Backup / Archive DiscussionReplies: 3Last Post: 01-11-2010, 03:07 AM -
Windows client incremental doing full backup
By ltapia in forum Backup / Archive DiscussionReplies: 2Last Post: 09-12-2007, 11:08 PM -
full incremental and partial incremental backup
By ccai in forum Backup / Archive DiscussionReplies: 4Last Post: 10-01-2004, 02:42 PM


Reply With Quote
