Results 1 to 2 of 2
-
07-23-2009, 04:45 AM #1Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Posts
- 12
- Thanks
- 0
- Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Server to Server Virtual Volumes..
Hi Everyone,
I've been using server to server virtual volumes for some time now to back up storage pools between data centres. When I originally set this up I found that the recommended size for the virtual volume was 500MB.
Surprisingly I now have thousands of virtual volumes on each site. These sit on LTO4 tapes.
The 500MB sounds pretty low to me. I assume that a low value is great for reclamation but slows down my storage pool backups as we have a lot of virtual volume mounts due the amount of virtual volumes needed per storage pool backup.
What size do other people use? Does anyone have any comments on the pros and cons of small vs large virtual volumes?
Thanks in advance,
Phill
-
07-23-2009, 09:04 AM #2Senior Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Location
- Oslo, Norway
- Posts
- 241
- Thanks
- 2
- Thanked 17 Times in 17 Posts
Hi,
I have set it to 40 Gb for servers connected to fast links (Gbit). With some tcp tuning, I get about 140Mbit/sec per server session.
For servers with low bandwidth, I use 2 Gbyte volumes.-= Trident =-
Similar Threads
-
TSM Database Backup to Virtual Volumes on Target Server
By pwilliams in forum TSM ServerReplies: 4Last Post: 04-04-2008, 11:04 AM -
Restore of TSM Server with help of virtual volumes
By noodles in forum Restore / Recovery DiscussionReplies: 3Last Post: 10-31-2007, 10:16 PM -
Server does not start after Image restore on virtual server
By JohannJ in forum Restore / Recovery DiscussionReplies: 0Last Post: 04-05-2006, 06:58 AM -
Virtual Server Backup
By MelX in forum Backup / Archive DiscussionReplies: 0Last Post: 12-09-2005, 10:55 AM -
Sudden performance issues with stg backups with server to server virtual volumes
By nestes in forum Performance TuningReplies: 1Last Post: 03-14-2005, 04:38 AM


Reply With Quote
