Results 1 to 8 of 8
Thread: LT04 Defective Tapes
-
03-24-2008, 03:15 PM #1
LT04 Defective Tapes
Has anyone noticed a significant defective percentage in the number of LT04 tapes that they use? We have ordered two 30+ LTO4 tapes from two different suppliers and seem to have a defective rate of about 13%. This is higher than the number of defective tapes that we get with our LTO3 tapes. I have opened PMR's with IBM support to confirm that it was not the tape drives or TSM. Just wanted to see what the general consensus is.
Thanks,
Robert
-
03-24-2008, 05:29 PM #2Senior Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2004
- Location
- West Coast...Beautiful California
- Posts
- 484
- Thanks
- 1
- Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Per IBM recommendation, stay with FUJI for LTO tapes...
FUJI LTO's are more reliable..
Good LuckSystems Engineering (Storage Administration)
"No matter how well we do something, there is always something we can do better" - Joel R.
-
03-25-2008, 11:02 AM #3Newcomer
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Posts
- 1
- Thanks
- 0
- Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
ttrinh7975,
Do you agree with IBM on this?
I haven't had any tests on LTO-4, only LTO-2 and due to the fact that you could not guarantee that either Fuji or Maxell branded cassettes contained their respective tape/chip we opted for Imation (as they only put their own tape into their cassettes).
My migration plan is based upon Imation so am interested to see anything that would suggest otherwise.
-
03-25-2008, 11:26 AM #4Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2004
- Location
- Great White North
- Posts
- 642
- Thanks
- 0
- Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hi.
we've been using IMATION tapes ever since the original introduction of my 3584 (with lto2). We've now moved on through lto3 and 4 and i do not get many 'bad' tapes...
Do you see a pattern with the bad tapes always coming from the same drives?? could be a bad drive instead...and all that could have been...
-
03-25-2008, 01:13 PM #5Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- St Louis
- Posts
- 286
- Thanks
- 0
- Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
We use a enterprise HP library with HP tapes. LTO4 for about 3-4 months now. Havent had any more than with LTO3
-
03-28-2008, 08:59 PM #6
Looks like my issue might be a drive. Seems to occur on one specific drive. Thanks for the replies.
-
03-31-2008, 09:21 AM #7Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Posts
- 27
- Thanks
- 0
- Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'm using the TS3200 tape library and I have experienced the same problems with LTO4 tapes. I've tried dfferent tape brands but there was no difference. About a mounth ago IBM released new firmware for the library and the tape drives. After upgrading the firmware I havn't had any read or write errors.
Good Luck
-
03-31-2008, 09:23 AM #8Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2004
- Location
- Great White North
- Posts
- 642
- Thanks
- 0
- Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Makes a little more sense that way doesn't it?

When i do get an error on a tape, i take note of the drive it happened on, just to make sure that if i do get another error that same day or sometime soon after, it isn't the same drive...
If it is, i usually don't mess around too much and get a replacement from IBM...and all that could have been...
Similar Threads
-
Select to get the number of tapes needed to restore a node from offsite tapes
By shanafin in forum Restore / Recovery DiscussionReplies: 2Last Post: 08-06-2008, 05:54 PM -
LT04 vs 3592
By 47hex in forum Tape / Media LibraryReplies: 4Last Post: 02-01-2008, 01:16 AM -
Bar code reader on a 3584 defective
By moon-buddy in forum Tape / Media LibraryReplies: 2Last Post: 08-10-2007, 11:25 AM -
Simple way to replace a defective LTO2 tape ?
By gniagnia in forum Tape / Media LibraryReplies: 2Last Post: 11-16-2005, 04:41 AM -
Running out of scratch tapes, lots of database backup tapes.
By ananke in forum Tape / Media LibraryReplies: 5Last Post: 04-04-2005, 10:25 AM


Reply With Quote
