Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    10
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default Backupset generation incredibly slow

    We know that we need to spread our database onto more spindles, but we've got some other issues, too.

    We keep a copy stgpool of our main tape pool. When we generate a backupset, it seems to check every object in the tape stgpool and the offsite copy stgpool. Is there a way to avoid this in order to speed things up?

    Any other backupset generation tips would be very welcomed, we're generating one right now for five average-size servers and it's been going for about 30 hours (and is only finishing up the third). This is on modern hardware, too.

  2. #2
    Senior Member ttrinh7975's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    West Coast...Beautiful California
    Posts
    484
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts

    Cool

    krankin-

    It's all depends on how much data are you generating the backupset from.
    If the server have been around for awhile... The backupset will take time.

    I ran into a backupset ran for 2 days. The node has about 250GB of storage
    but over time those data grew...

    Just gotta wait
    Systems Engineering (Storage Administration)

    "No matter how well we do something, there is always something we can do better" - Joel R.

  3. #3
    Moderator BBB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    2,072
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts

    Default

    >When we generate a backupset, it seems to check every object in the tape stgpool and
    > the offsite copy stgpool. Is there a way to avoid this in order to speed things up?

    As in it mounts all of the tapes?

    Sounds like the node is not collocated, which could slow down the generate backupset by a great deal.

  4. #4

    Default

    Depending the tape technology you are using a backup set generation is similar to a restore. If the data is a bunch of small files and any fragmentation on the tape (inactive object) then the process can be slow.

    LTO is the worst with small files and other tape is not much better.

    To resolve this issue:
    1. Move all the node data to disk
    2. Generate the backup set.

    this will be a lot faster then a direct tape to tape generation.

Similar Threads

  1. Backupset
    By matcohen in forum Others
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-08-2007, 04:16 AM
  2. one backupset but two or more nodes
    By mkhan in forum Backup / Archive Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-31-2006, 03:02 PM
  3. Help scripting backupset generation and off-load
    By jambraun in forum Backup / Archive Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-23-2006, 11:28 AM
  4. Newbie Backup Set generation question
    By jambraun in forum Backup / Archive Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-23-2006, 11:18 AM
  5. one-off backupset or archive
    By wirb in forum Backup / Archive Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-17-2004, 03:13 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •